Log in to begin verifying for government benefit determinations or other government permissible purposes.
By Celeste Rearick
This year, mortgage lenders have competed with increasing interest rates, irregular markets, regulatory compliance, and competition. An evolving work force and erratic market have made an uncertain landscape even more challenging. Consumers are changing where and how they work – with many diverting away from staying with one employer for long tenures. It is believed the shift was perhaps triggered by the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting move to remote work, the demand for more flexibility, or new job opportunities in new markets. Reason aside, the actions have led to mortgage lenders seeing a rise in applications from borrowers with more untraditional employment and income profiles which can deter the likeliness of approval and underwriting process.
In most instances, a mortgage loan process from application to closing can take weeks and sometimes months. A particular barrier may include employment verification as the prospective loan moves through the origination process. Lenders take various approaches to verify employment. Data may be used and collected from multiple, often disconnected sources. This might include traditional and alternative sources like bank transaction data, consumer- permissioned data, and consumer-provided documents (ex., pay stubs, W-2s). They may also pursue alternative verification companies to get the answers they need—extending an already tedious process. Sadly, these employment verification methods negatively impact the borrower experience and waste time and resources.
In a recent MortgageOrb article, Ashley Wood discusses the economic conditions mortgage lenders have contended with, the importance of creating an expanded view of borrowers with VOIE data, changes in traditional employment, and mitigating risk.